Etisalat argument

I believe the companies like Etisalat in each country control the internet. In the UAE, Etisalat blocks some of the websites to control media content .However, in some countries they can access any sites they want. In this essay I will discuss both sides of the topic whether control of media is good or not.

People who support what Etisalat does believe that blocking the bad websites is useful for children .For example, children can access websites that effect our Islamic principles. Some people think that blocking these websites is a good way to keep people thinking about good things only. For example, the students can do their research without thinking to enter another sites. Control of the media is a good way so, you can leave your children alone while watching TV.

On the other hand some people who support open media think that they will learn more information about the world . For instance, they will know more about policies of other states. Open media gives you the chance to expand your knowledge about another cultures. If you travel you will not offend the customs of the country. Also, some of the people who support open media think that they can have several relations on the Net. This can help them in their practical life.

In conclusion, there are strong arguments both for against open media. I believe the points in favor to keep blocking sites is stronger than those against.